eISSN: 2353-9461
ISSN: 0860-7796
BioTechnologia
Current issue Archive About the journal Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
2/2023
vol. 104
 
Share:
Share:
RESEARCH PAPERS

Enhancing zinc levels in Solanum lycopersicum L. through biofortification with plant growth-promoting Pseudomonas spp. isolated from cow dung

Arun Karnwal
1

  1. Department of Microbiology, School of Bioengineering and Biosciences, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab, India
BioTechnologia vol. 104(2) ∙ pp. 157–169 ∙ 2023
Online publish date: 2023/06/26
Article file
Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
 

Introduction

Zinc is a crucial micronutrient required for normal growth and development in all living beings. Zinc acts as a cofactor for nearly 300 (10–15%) cellular enzymes, which include superoxide dismutase (SOD) and tryptophan-synthetase (Suganya et al., 2020). SOD is responsible for converting superoxide to H2O2, while tryptophan-synthetase catalyzes the transformation of serine and indol-3-glycerol phosphate into tryptophan, both of which occur during tryptophan biosynthesis (Schlee et al., 2013).

The required amount of zinc for crops varies from 5 to 100 mg/kg, depending on the crop. Examples of crops that require zinc include okra, wheat, tomato, and maize (Baruah et al., 2019; Eshaghi et al., 2019). Zinc is essential for various cellular processes, such as indole metabolism, membrane functioning, carbonic anhydrase, RNA polymerases, macromolecule metabolism, alcohol dehydrogenase, chloroplast production, and others (Nieder et al., 2018; Salehi et al., 2019).

Plants absorb zinc in the dissolved form as Zn2+, although a significant portion of zinc in the soil is insoluble. Several physical and chemical soil variables induce zinc shortage in staple foods, including elevated bicarbonate and phosphate levels, high alkalinity, low total zinc content, and high calcite content (Schlee et al., 2013; Nieder et al., 2018; Eshaghi et al., 2019; Salehi et al., 2019). The low zinc content in India's agricultural soil adversely affects the country's agricultural output (Baruah et al., 2019).

Plant growth and health can be improved by adding microbial inoculants, vermicompost, organic compost, and chemical fertilizers, which also enhance soil composition and consistency. However, the widespread use of chemical fertilizers in conventional farming practices can lead to a loss of soil qualities and a detrimental effect on soil microflora. To reduce zinc demand in plant life and agricultural production, exceptional bacteria that can potentially solubilize inaccessible forms of insoluble zinc into soluble forms can be isolated as a potential technique.

Tomatoes are now being recognized for their potential in preventing certain human ailments due to their high content of carotenoids and lycopene. Lycopene, an unsaturated alkylic molecule, is thought to be an active component in protecting against cancer, cardiovascular disease, and delaying cellular aging (Salehi et al., 2019). Tomatoes also contain various nutrients and secondary metabolites beneficial to human health, such as lycopene, organic acids, B-carotene, flavonoids, phenolics, vitamins C and E, minerals, and chlorophyll (Li et al., 2021).

To enhance soil health and consistency, synthetic fertilizers, natural manure, vermicast, or microbiological inoculants can be added to stimulate plant growth and improve soil health (Nieder et al., 2018; Karagoz and Dursun, 2020). Using cow dung as a fertilizer is an environmentally friendly alternative to synthetic fertilizers that helps maintain soil attributes by providing necessary nutrients over a more extended period and preserving the microflora of soil (Suganya et al., 2020; Ahmed et al., 2021). The microorganisms available in cow dung may also work as plant growth-promoting (PGP) agents by providing phytohormones and mineralizing unutilized minerals. Therefore, selecting relevant zincsolubilizing bacteria (ZSB) from cow dung is the foremost and most crucial step in the current work.

This step involves detecting cow dung bacteria exhibiting PGP properties, zinc solubilizing efficiency, and examining tomato growth parameters. The present work aims to isolate and screen ZSB from cow dung and assess their potential PGP attributes, such as phytohormone production (indole acetic acid (IAA)), iron-chelator production (siderophore), aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase activity, and inorganic phosphate solubilization in the laboratory. Furthermore, the isolated Zn-solubilizing PGP bacteria were tested for their potential to improve plant growth in vivo on tomato seeds in a pot assay, and plant growth parameters, such as plant development, stem girth, fruit numbers, and fruit Zn content, were recorded.

Methods

Screening of Zn solubilizing bacteria from cow dung

To isolate and screen the ZSB, cow dung was collected from the Bhojia Institute of Life Sciences (BILS) in Baddi, Himachal Pradesh, India (31°2′37.9716″N, 76°43′3.1296″E). One gram of cow dung sample was thoroughly pulverized and utilized in the study. A 100 μl diluted sample (10−5 to 10−6 dilution) was disseminated on optimized King's B media (protease peptone 20 g/l, K2HPO4 1.5 g/l, MgSO4 · 7H2O 1.5 g/l, glycerol 10 ml/l, and agar 15 g/l) supplemented with an insoluble zinc source (0.1% ZnO or 0.1% ZnCO3) individual medium (Karnwal, 2021b). The plates were then incubated at 28±2°C for 2 days. Bacterial isolates that exhibited Zn solubilization and formed halo zones around the bacterial colonies were selected to assess zinc solubilization and plant growth promotion activities. Eleven positive strains for Zn solubilization were obtained in pure form and stored as 30% glycerol stocks at −20°C.

Zinc-solubilization analysis

To determine the Zn solubilization, Zn solubility index (SI), and Zn solubility efficiency (SE) of selected ZSB, a higher concentration of insoluble Zn source (1% ZnO or 0.1% ZnCO3) was used. After 24 h of incubation at 28±2° C, the bacterial isolates were spotted on Zn source (ZnO and ZnCO3) enriched King's B plates and cultivated for five days at 28±2°C. Bacterial isolates with the maximum solubility of insoluble Zn were separated, and the diameters of the solubility zones were measured. The SI and SE of bacterial isolates were calculated (Goteti et al., 2013) using the following formulas:

SI=(bacterial colony diameter + halo zone diameter)bacterial diameter colony
SE=halo zone diameterbacterial colony diameter

The residual Zn content in the bacterial suspension was measured using atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) at 5, 10, and 15 days intervals to estimate the Zn content. The AAS findings presented zinc amounts in parts per million. The pH of the culture filtrates and control (uninoculated) samples were also assessed at 5, 10, and 15 days after inoculation under acidic and alkaline conditions. The pH of the nutrient broth with Zn source was adjusted using 1 M HCl and 1 M NaOH during the experiment to maintain a pH of 7. Zinc-solubilizing bacterial isolates were then inoculated on the zinc-supplemented medium and incubated at 28±2°C for 24 h for solubilization.

Assessment of isolates for their PGP activities

Eleven bacterial isolates were evaluated for their ability to promote plant growth, including their phytohormone production (i.e., IAA), iron-chelator production (siderophore), ACC deaminase activity, and inorganic phosphate solubilization. The Salkowski reagent was used to qualitatively and quantitatively analyze IAA production by the 11 bacterial isolates (Palaniappan et al., 2010 ; Shao et al., 2015).

The Chrome-azurol S agar media was used to determine siderophore production and quantification, as described by Schwyn and Neilands (1987). The bacterial ability to produce ACC deaminase was determined using the sole carbon source, ACC, in a supplemented media, following the approach of Dworkin and Foster (1958).

Pathogenicity of isolates

Two isolates were selected based on their Zn solubilization and PGP activities for pathogenicity testing. The selected isolates' pathogenicity was determined using blood-agar plates to assess their hemolytic activity. The blood-agar plates were prepared using sterilized nutrient agar (Hi-media) medium. For the blood agar, sterilized nutrient agar was cooled to 45–50°C and aseptically mixed with 6% sterile defibrinated sheep blood purchased from a nearby slaughterhouse. The mixture was then plated in sterile Petri plates under laminar airflow. These plates were spotted with the bacterial cultures and incubated at 28±2°C for 48 h to determine the ability of the bacterial isolates to hemolyze red blood cells. The plates were examined for α (greenish), β (transparent), and γ hemolysis (no zone) as described by Jayaseelan et al. (2014).

Characterization and phylogenetic analysis of isolates

The selected bacterial isolates were characterized microscopically and biochemically using Bergey's manual of determinative bacteriology (Holt et al., 1994). To isolate bacterial DNA from a pure bacterial culture, the modified CTAB approach was used (Karnwal, 2021a). Universal PCR primers were used for 16S rRNA gene amplification of bacterial isolates, as described by Karnwal (2021a). The sequenced 16S rRNA gene was aligned with the GENBANK database using the BLAST tool to match with the available type strain sequence and submitted to the GENBANK database with OL960375 and OL960472 accession numbers.

Bacterial consortium analysis

Both ZSB were evaluated for their compatibility as a microbial consortium. To develop a bacterial consortium, Luria Bertani plates were spread with 1000 μl of one isolate and incubated for 15 min at 28±2°C. This was followed by inoculation with another bacterial culture and cultivation at 28±2°C for 24–48 h, as described by Baliyan et al. (2018) and Wang et al. (2021).

Pot assay

The study investigated the effects of two selected isolates (CDS7 and CDS21) on the growth and development of tomato plants. To bacterize healthy tomato seeds, the approach described by Weller and Cook (1983) was followed. Tomato seeds (Solanum lycopersicum L.) were obtained from IARI, Pusa, New Delhi, India, and surface sterilized using 95% ethyl alcohol for 1 min and 7% sodium hypochlorite for 3 min. The seeds were then washed with sterilized distilled water (DW) three times to remove the remaining sterilizing chemicals. Surface sterilized seeds were dried aseptically under a laminar airflow hood. The bacterial culture in nutrient agar medium was freshly grown (24-h incubation) and placed in a cooling centrifuge at 10 000 g for 10 min to isolate the bacterial pellet.

Subsequently, the bacterial pellets were suspended in sterile DW and blended with 1% carboxy-methyl-cellulose to form the final solution, referred to as bacterial slurry. The surface of the sterilized seeds was coated with the bacterial slurry. For the pot study, a randomized block pattern with eight seeds per pot was used, with the seeds inoculated separately with both bacterial isolates and a consortium of both bacterial slurries, and no bacterial slurry was used as the control. Sterilized soil was used in triplicates for each treatment, as follows:

T1 treatment: control;

T2 treatment: (seeds + CDS7);

T3 treatment: (seeds + CDS21);

T4 treatment: (seeds + consortium).

After 60 days of planting (DAP), root and shoot (fresh/dry) weight, root length, and plant height were measured. The tomato fruits were harvested after 60 days of the plantation, and their Zn concentrations were determined in each treatment.

Plant growth measurements

At maturity, which was 60 days after planting, the plants were collected, and data on plant development, stem girth, fruit numbers, and fruit Zn content were recorded. Physiological data were measured during the growth period. The fresh shoot and root biomass were determined using an electronic balance after harvesting. The shoots and roots were then dried in the oven at 72°C until they reached a consistent weight, and their dry weights were measured.

Zn content analysis

To assess the Zn content in the tomato fruit samples from each treatment, the samples were first dried at 70°C for 48 h and then pulverized. One gram of the pulverized fruit sample was digested in 10 ml of HNO3: HClO4 (2 :1 v/v) for Zn assessment, as described by Dhaked et al. (2017). The filtered solution of Whatman's filter paper-42 was subjected to spectrophotometric analysis using AAS to estimate the total Zn amount, following the method described by Karnwal (2021b). The obtained data were statistically analyzed. The Zn concentration of the soil used for the experiment was also tested before planting and after 60 days of planting.

Statistical analysis

The data collected during the experiment were presented with standard error (± SEM) as the mean of triplets. The significance of the data collected throughout the experiments was evaluated using a one-way analysis of variance.

Results

In this study, Pseudomonas spp. were identified from cow dung. Out of 35 bacterial isolates tested based on their ability to solubilize zinc sources (ZnO and ZnCO3), only 11 isolates were effective and were labeled as CDS3, CDS7, CDS9, CDS11, CDS14, CDS17, CDS21, CDS25, CDS26, CDS27, and CDS32. These 11 isolates were examined for morphological and biochemical characteristics, which are presented in Table 1.

Table 1

Microscopic and biochemical characterization of isolated bacterial strains

Bacterial isolatesGram stainingCatalaseCitrateMethyl RedStarch hydrolysisVoges-ProskauerH2S gas productionUrease test
CDS3G(–)ve++++
CDS7G(–)ve+++
CDS9G(–)ve+
CDS11G(–)ve
CDS14G(–)ve+
CDS17G(–)ve++++
CDS21G(–)ve+
CDS25G(–)ve+++
CDS26G(–)ve++++
CDS27G(–)ve+
CDS32G(–)ve++

Molecular identification of the CDS7 and CDS21 isolates

The results of 16S rRNA gene sequencing of CDS7 and CDS21 showed that they had 97.17 and 95.33% similarity, respectively, with Pseudomonas kilonensis 520-20 and Pseudomonas chlororaphis DSM 50083. The 16S rDNA sequences for both strains, P. kilonensis CDS7 and P. chlororaphis CDS21, were deposited in the GenBank (NCBI) repository with the accession IDs OL960375 and OL960472, respectively. A phylogenetic tree was created for both strains, which is shown in Figure 1.

Fig. 1

Phylogenetic tree of bacterial isolates for A) CDS7 and B) CDS21

/f/fulltexts/BTA/50642/BTA-104-2-50642-g001_min.jpg

In-vitro zinc solubilization assessment

The ability of two bacterial isolates to solubilize zinc was evaluated by measuring the transparent zone around their bacterial colony growth. All 11 isolates tested in this study showed different levels of solubility of zinc in media enriched with ZnO and ZnCO3. CDS27 exhibited the largest zone of Zn solubilization (32 mm) on a medium supplemented with zinc oxide, followed by CDS7 (26 mm) and CDS21 (25 mm) after seven days of incubation. CDS14 and CDS26 also displayed significant Zn solubilization with a 20 mm zone of solubilization in media supplemented with an insoluble ZnO (Fig. 2A). However, in media enriched with zinc carbonate, comparable solubilization by CDS27 (24 mm), CDS21 (22 mm), and CDS7 (18 mm) was observed. After 15 days of incubation, the results of AAS showed that CDS7 (32.1 mg/l) had the maximum solubilization of zinc oxide, followed by CDS21 (23.7 mg/l) and CDS27 (21.8 mg/l). In contrast, in media supplemented with zinc carbonate, CDS7 (19.4 mg/l) showed the highest zinc solubilization, followed by CDS21 (17.2 mg/l) and CDS27 (15.2 mg/l), as shown in Figure 3A. Compared to the other six isolates, CDS7 and CDS21 demonstrated higher Zn solubilization efficiency (ZnO) with 650 and 416.67%, respectively, followed by CDS27 (390.24%) and CDS11 (320.00%). Although there was variability in solubilization efficiency in media supplemented with ZnCO3, CDS7, and CDS21 exhibited better results, followed by CDS27 and CDS17, as depicted in Figure 2C.

Fig. 2

Zn solubilization assessment of isolated bacterial isolates after 7 days of incubation (DAI): A) solubilization zone, B) solubilization index, and C) solubilization efficiency

/f/fulltexts/BTA/50642/BTA-104-2-50642-g002_min.jpg
Fig. 3

Zn solubilization efficiency of isolated bacterial strains on ZnO and ZnCO3 supplemented media A) AAS results for Zn solubilization by isolated bacterial strains after 15 DAI; B) ZnO-supplemented media pH after 7 DAI depending on Zn solubilization efficiency; C) ZnCO3-supplemented media pH after 7 DAI depending on Zn solubilization efficiency

/f/fulltexts/BTA/50642/BTA-104-2-50642-g003_min.jpg

The results of the alkaline and acidic Zn solubilization assessments indicated that the pH of media supplemented with ZnO and ZnCO3 was reduced to 4.6 and 5.4, respectively, after 15 days of incubation, compared to the initial pH of 7. In the presence of zinc oxide, the cellfree culture of CDS7 was found to have a pH of 4.6, followed by CDS21 with a pH level of 5.1 (Fig. 3B). In contrast, in the culture-free supernatant enriched with ZnCO3-modified media, corresponding isolates had reported pH values of 5.1 and 5.4, respectively (Fig. 3C). The lower pH indicates a higher level of acidity.

Assessment of PGP characteristics

Microorganisms that have a positive impact on plant growth play a crucial role in plant development through direct or indirect mechanisms, including the production of phytohormones such as indole butyric acid, indole acetic acid, gibberellic acid, cytokines, organic acids, siderophores, ACC deaminase, hydrogen cyanide (HCN), and mineral mineralization of phosphorus and zinc. In this study, it was determined in vitro that all 11 Zn solubilizing isolates had PGP characteristics, such as phosphate solubilization, IAA generation, siderophore synthesis, and ACC deaminase, as shown in Table 2. CDS7 had the highest phosphate solubilization ability (287.2 μg/ml), followed by CDS21 (217.7 μg/ml) and CDS27 (194.47 μg/ml) among the 11 isolates (Table 2). Isolates CDS3, CDS9, CDS25, CDS26, and CDS32 did not exhibit any phosphate solubilization efficiency. Additionally, the IAA production experiment indicated the potential of IAA production by six Zn solubilizing strains (CDS3, CDS7, CDS9, CDS21, CDS27, and CDS32), with IAA production ranging between 9.8 and 22.1 μg/ml after 24–72 h of incubation. CDS7 and CDS3 produced the highest levels of IAA, 22.1 and 15.71 μg/ml, respectively (Table 2). CDS21, CDS27, and CDS9 produced 14.8, 13.5, and 13.7 μg/ml of IAA, respectively. Out of the 11 isolates tested for siderophore production, four isolates (CDS7, CDS21, CDS26, and CDS32) were found to be positive (Table 2). The maximum levels of ACC deaminase activity were observed after 8 days of culturing for CDS9, followed by CDS25 and CDS27.

Table 2

Comparative analysis of bacterial isolates based on PGP characteristics, n = 3

IsolatesProduction of siderophoreACC deaminaseIndole acetic acid productionIAA quantity [μg/ml]Solubilization of phosphatePhosphate solubilization [μg/ml]
CDS3++++*15.7±0.120±0 a
CDS7+++++++22.1±0.43+++287.2±6.8
CDS9++++13.7±0.440±0
CDS11+0±0+65±3.6
CDS14+0±0+163±4.8
CDS170±0+76±2.1
CDS21++++14.8±1.6+++217.7±8.8
CDS25+++0±00±0
CDS26+++0±00±0
CDS27++++13.5±0.55+197.47±3.8
CDS32++++9.8±2.40±0

* (–), (+), (++), (+++) – indicates zero, least, moderate, and maximum activity;

a – values in columns are mean ± SE

Pot experiment and analysis of tomato biological growth parameters

Results from the pot study demonstrated that seedlings treated with CDS7 (T2) produced significantly more fruits per plant (41.49/plant) and had significantly greater plant height (63.16 cm), stem girth (22.00 cm), fresh and dry shoot weight (38.03 and 8.06 g, respectively), and root weight (17.97 and 4.68 g, respectively) than seedlings treated with CDS21 (T3) after 60 days of cultivation. Moreover, the T2 treatment yielded the highest number of fruits (41.49), followed by the T4 treatment with 37.79 fruits per plant after 60 DAP. Zinc levels in the fruits showed a significant increase in the inoculated plants compared to the control (T1), as shown in Table 3. The maximum Zn content was found in the T2 and T4 treatments, with 3.13 and 2.36 mg/100 g of fruit, respectively, followed by the T3 treatment with 2.24 mg/100 g. This finding suggests a 45–60% increase in fruit yield and a 255–398% increase in fruit Zn content, which could be attributed to the inoculation of bacterial strains capable of producing phytohormones, organic acids, siderophores, and performing P-solubilization.

Table 3

Results of tomato growth attributes after 60 days of planting with different treatments, n = 3

TreatmentGrowth parameters
Shoot length [cm]Root length [cm]Shoot weight [g]Root weight [g]Stem girth [mm/plant]Fruit yield [g/plant]Zn content of fruit [mg/100 g]
freshdryfreshdry
T150.09±1.1421.23±0.5029.58±0.564.68±0.2412.33±0.062.53±0.0615.46±0.1525.92±0.600.63±0.02
T263.16±0.8827.10±0.6238.03±0.748.06±0.2317.97±0.244.68±0.0622.00±0.2641.49±0.243.13±0.22
T358.80±1.0229.92±0.2833.90±0.377.30±0.9217.42±0.827.48±0.1219.16±0.1835.72±1.082.24±0.56
T459.89±1.0831.85±1.0132.61±0.766.64±0.1218.94±0.444.06±0.0820.04±0.1837.79±0.882.36±0.84

[i] Values in columns are mean ± SE; T1 – control, T2 – seeds + CDS7, T3 – seeds + CDS21 and T4 – seeds + consortium

Discussion

Zinc deficiency is a prevalent micronutrient deficiency in crops, resulting in significant agricultural production losses (Upadhayay et al., 2022). Zinc is a crucial micronutrient for plant growth and Upadhyay plays a significant role in their development. Biofortification of crops has gained considerable attention in enhancing mineral biofortification in plants and their products. Biofortification presents a realistic and cost-effective option for low-income nations to produce food with higher Zn content, as biofortified foods are readily accessible and affordable compared to industrially fortified food (Sharma et al., 2015; Prasad et al., 2019).

This study aimed to investigate the biofortification of zinc in plants by promoting their growth. The availability of dissolved zinc in the soil is limited, which reduces the soil’s nutritional value (Palaniappan et al., 2010; Karnwal, 2021b). Using zinc mobilizing bacteria as bioinoculants can aid in providing adequate zinc content and rendering it from an inaccessible to an accessible form, which is essential for plant development. This study included the isolation, characterization, and screening of bacteria from cow dung for their Zn mobilization and PGP activity. Two insoluble Zn sources (ZnO and ZnCO3) were used to assess the Zn solubilizing potential of the isolates. ZnO and ZnCO3 are the most cost-effective forms of zinc since they supply 50–80% zinc, more than zinc sulfate (ZnSO4), which only delivers 33% zinc (Hafeez et al., 2013). The primary challenge with using ZnO and ZnCO3 in fields is their low solubility and bioavailability compared to ZnSO4, which is considerably more soluble.

In this study, a total of 35 bacterial isolates were examined for their ability to solubilize zinc from cow dung samples obtained from dairies near BILS. Among the isolates tested, CDS21 and CDS7 were found to be the most efficient ZSB strains. These strains were further investigated for their ability to promote plant growth through the synthesis of IAA, siderophores, P-solubilization, and ACC deaminase activity.

This study evaluated the Zn solubilizing and PGP capabilities of cow dung microflora and found them to be highly beneficial in reducing media pH and increasing Zn mobilization. Previous research (Kumar et al., 2019) has shown that ZSB inoculation can stimulate shoot and root development by releasing Zn-chelating residues. Microorganisms' ability to solubilize rock phosphate has also played a vital role in increasing the bioavailability of rock phosphate to plants (Ahmed et al., 2021). The Zn solubilizing activity of Pseudomonas sp. (ZSB-S-2) was previously reported to increase Zn release from ZnO (Shaikh and Saraf, 2017). In the current study, CDS7 and CDS21 exhibited higher Zn solubilization efficiency (ZnO) of 650 and 416.67%, respectively, followed by CDS27 (390.24%) and CDS11 (320.00%). These findings are consistent with earlier reports where maximum Zn solubilization was achieved in ZnO and ZnCO3-supplemented media (Mumtaz et al., 2017; Mumtaz et al., 2019; Bhatt and Maheshwari, 2020; Karnwal, 2021a). These findings are also supported by the study of Ramesh et al. (2014), where strains of Bacillus aryabhattai were found to have Zn solubilizing efficiency of up to 175%.

The results of our study are consistent with previous findings. For example, Sharma et al. (2011) reported that the zinc concentration of different Bacillus spp. ranged between 2.23 and 4.87 μg/ml. Costerousse et al. (2017) found that Streptomyces narbonensis strain 68 exhibited good zinc-solubilizing ability, with a zinc content of 272.2 μg/ml in a solubilization assay medium containing ZnO. Streptomyces nanhaiensis strain YM4 showed a zinc solubilization of 41.66 μg/ml in a minimal medium supplemented with 0.1% (w/v) ZnO (Patel and Thakker, 2020). In another study, Yadav et al. (2022) found that different rhizobacterial strains produced varying levels of zinc content in a liquid medium, ranging from 2.47 to 6.1 μg/ml.

As mentioned in a previous study (Shaikh and Saraf, 2017), pH plays a critical role in achieving maximal solubilization of zinc. Mumtaz et al. (2017) found a direct relationship between the drop in pH of the medium and the increase in zinc availability. In the study by Yadav et al. (2022), it was reported that rhizobacterial isolates with zinc solubilizing capability were able to lower the pH of the medium from 7 to 4.5. The present study also found that all 11 isolates were able to decrease the pH of the media, with pH values between 4.6 and 5.1 being optimal for maximal solubilization of ZnO by CDS7 and CDS21 (650 and 416.6% solubilization efficiency). For optimum solubilization of ZnCO3 by CDS7 and CDS21, pH 5.1 and 5.4 were found to be optimal (with solubilization efficiencies of 450 and 366.6%, respectively), preceded by pH 5.6 for CDS27 (with a solubilization efficiency of 292.6%). The findings of this study are consistent with the earlier reports by Mumtaz et al. (2017) which showed a direct relationship between the decrease in pH of the medium and the increase in zinc availability and with the findings of Yadav et al. (2022) regarding the ability of zinc-solubilizing rhizobacterial isolates to lower the pH from 7 to 4.5.

PGP bacteria play a vital role in plant growth through various mechanisms, including the production of IAA, organic acids, HCN, siderophores, ACC deaminase activity, and mineralization of various minerals such as P liquefaction and Zn solubilization, all of which are beneficial characteristics for plant development (Qessaoui et al., 2019).

In previous studies, microbial inoculants with the ability to produce IAA, Zn, and P solubilization have been shown to play a crucial role in promoting plant growth and crop yields, particularly in okra (Karnwal, 2021b). Pseudomonas strains have been identified as having the ability to solubilize phosphate, synthesize siderophores, ammonia, and indole-3-acetic acid, and colonize the roots of tomato plants (Qessaoui et al., 2019). In the current investigation, the inoculation of ZSB led to enhanced fruits per plant, plant height, stem girth, fresh and dry shoot weight, fresh and dry root weight, and Zn content in fruits after 60 days of cultivation (35.72–41.49/plant, 58.80 –63.16 cm, 19.16–22.00 cm, 32.61–38.03 g, 6.64–8.06 g, 17.42–18.94 g, 4.06–7.48 g, 2.24–3.13 mg/100 g, respectively).

The previous study by Vidyashree et al. (2018) showed that Bacillus sp. (PAN-TM1) had a direct growth-promoting impact on tomato seedlings, with the best growth attributes including plant height (94.1 cm), number of branches per plant (27.6), stem girth (2.05 cm), and total biomass (100–30.7 g). Meanwhile, Zaheer et al. (2016) found that inoculating chickpeas with Pseudomonas strain AZ5 or Bacillus strain AZ17 resulted in significant increases in growth parameters compared to noncontrols. However, Pseudomonas AZ5 strain treated plants had a higher grain production and straw mass compared to Bacillus AZ17 strain treated crops. Similar findings were reported by Vidyashree et al. (2018), where increased Zn solubility in the presence of B. aryabhattai and Bacillus sp. (PAN-TM1) enhanced tomato development through the release of several organic acids and the production of PGP molecules such as auxins, gibberellic acid, and siderophore. In another study, Fan et al. (2017) observed that Bacillus amyloliquefaciens IN937a and Bacillus pumilus T4 promoted tomato growth, significantly impacting tomato development by boosting dry shoot mass and shoot nitrogen absorption ability. PGPR inoculation improved shoot N absorption from 10.2 to 39.0% compared to control. Additionally, Vaid et al. (2014) reported rice growth promotion and 42.7% increased zinc nutrition of grains when inoculated with zinc-solubilizing bacteria. Several reports have high-lighted the role of PGP microbes in promoting plant growth parameters through multiple mechanisms (Zaheer et al., 2016; Fan et al., 2017; Vidyashree et al., 2018). To the best of our understanding, the isolates P. kilonensis CDS7 and P. chlororaphis CDS21 used in this investigation have not yet been documented for their zinc-solubilizing potential, zinc biofortification, and role in enhancing the growth of tomato plants. However, our study showed that these strains increased tomato plant root and shoot length, dry weight, and zinc content compared to the ideal control.

Conclusion

It is noteworthy that this study is the first to report on the screening of Zn solubilizing PGP bacteria isolated from cow dung. The results of the study demonstrate that the application of Zn solubilizing PGP bacteria to tomato seedlings leads to improved growth and increased production of tomatoes. Moreover, the various PGP characteristics of the isolates suggest that they have the potential to be used as microbial biofertilizers to enhance tomato production while also addressing nutrient deficiencies, which is crucial for long-term agricultural sustainability.

Acknowledgments

The authors express their sincere gratitude thank the Bhojia Institute of Life Sciences, Budh, Baddi, H.P., India, for providing invaluable technical support, which was essential for the successful completion of this study.

Competing interest statement

The author declares that they have no conflict of interest.

References

1 

Ahmed R., Yusoff Abd Samad M., Uddin M., Quddus M., Hossain M.A. (2021) Recent trends in the foliar spraying of zinc nutrient and zinc oxide nanoparticles in tomato production. Agronomy 11(10): 2074.

2 

Baliyan N., Dheeman S., Maheshwari D.K., Dubey R.C., Vishnoi V.K. (2018) Rhizobacteria isolated under field first strategy improved chickpea growth and productivity. Environ. Sustain. 1(4): 461–469.

3 

Baruah N., Mondal S.C., Farooq M., Ogoi G.N. (2019) Influence of heavy metals on seed germination and seedling growth of wheat, pea, and tomato. Water Air Soil Pollut. 230(12): 1–15.

4 

Bhatt K., Maheshwari D.K. (2020) Zinc solubilizing bacteria (Bacillus megaterium) with multifarious plant growth promoting activities alleviates growth in Capsicum annuum L. 3 Biotech 10(2): 1–10.

5 

Costerousse B., Schönholzer-Mauclaire L., Frossard E., Thonar C. (2018) Identification of heterotrophic zinc mobilization processes among bacterial strains isolated from wheat rhizosphere (Triticum aestivum L.). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 84(1): e01715–e01717.

6 

Dhaked B.S., Triveni S., Reddy R.S., Padmaja G. (2017) Isolation and screening of potassium and zinc solubilizing bacteria from different rhizosphere soil. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 6(8): 1271–1281.

7 

Dworkin M., Foster J.W. (1958) Experiments with some microorganisms which utilize ethane and hydrogen. J. Bacteriol. 75(5): 592.

8 

Eshaghi E., Nosrati R., Owlia P., Malboobi M.A., Ghaseminejad P., Ganjali M.R. (2019) Zinc solubilization characteristics of efficient siderophore-producing soil bacteria. Iran. J. Microbiol. 11(5): 419–430.

9 

Fan X.H., Zhang S.A., Mo X.D., Li Y.C., Fu Y.Q., Liu Z.G. (2017) Effects of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and N source on plant growth and N and P uptake by tomato grown on calcareous soils. Pedosphere 27(6): 1027–1036.

10 

Goteti P.K., Emmanuel L.D., Desai S., Shaik M.H. (2013) Prospective zinc solubilising bacteria for enhanced nutrient uptake and growth promotion in maize (Zea mays L.). Int. J. Microbiol. 869697–869697.

11 

Hafeez F.Y., Abaid-Ullah M., Hassan M.N. (2013) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria as zinc mobilizers: a promising approach for cereals biofortification. [in:] Bacteria in agrobiology: crop productivity. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg: 217–235.

12 

Holt J.G., Kreig N.R., Sneath P.H.A., Staley J.T., Williams S.T. (1994) Bergey's manual of determinative bacteriology, 9th ed. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore.

13 

Karagoz F.P., Dursun A. (2020) Effects of PGPR formulations, chemical fertilizers, and their combinations on physiological traits and quality of bracts of poinsettia. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 22(3): 775–787.

14 

Karnwal A. (2021a) Pseudomonas spp., a zinc-solubilizing vermicompost bacteria with plant growth-promoting activity moderates zinc biofortification in tomato. Int. J. Veg. Sci. 27(4): 398–412.

15 

Karnwal A. (2021b) Zinc solubilizing Pseudomonas spp. from vermicompost bestowed with multifaceted plant growth promoting properties and having prospective modulation of zinc biofortification in Abelmoschus esculentus L. J. Plant Nutr. 44(7): 1023–1038.

16 

Kumar A., Dewangan S., Lawate P., Bahadur I., Prajapati S. (2019) Zinc-solubilizing bacteria: a boon for sustainable agriculture. [in:] Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria for sustainable stress management. Springer, Singapore: 139–155.

17 

Li N., Wu X., Zhuang W., Xia L., Chen Y., Wu C., Rao Z., Du L., Zhao R., Yi M., Wan Q., Zhou Y. (2021) Tomato and lycopene and multiple health outcomes: Umbrella review. Food Chem. 343: 128396.

18 

Mumtaz M.Z., Ahmad M., Jamil M., Hussain T. (2017) Zinc solubilizing Bacillus spp. potential candidates for biofortification in maize. Microbiol. Res. 202: 51–60.

19 

Mumtaz M.Z., Barry K.M., Baker A.L., Nichols D.S., Ahmad M., Zahir Z.A., Britz M.L. (2019) Production of lactic and acetic acids by Bacillus sp. ZM20 and Bacillus cereus following exposure to zinc oxide: a possible mechanism for Zn solubilization. Rhizosphere 12: 100170.

20 

Nieder R., Benbi D.K., Reichl F.X. (2018) Microelements and their role in human health. [in:] Soil components and human health. Springer, Dordrecht: 317–374.

21 

Palaniappan P., Chauhan P.S., Saravanan V.S., Anandham R., Sa T. (2010) Isolation and characterization of plant growth promoting endophytic bacterial isolates from root nodule of Lespedeza sp. Biol. Fertil. Soils 46(8): 807–816.

22 

Patel K.B., Thakker J.N. (2021) Deliberating plant growth promoting and mineral-weathering proficiency of Streptomyces nanhaiensis strain YM4 for nutritional benefit of millet crop (pennisetum glaucum). J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Food Sci. 2021: 721–726.

23 

Prasad M., Srinivasan R., Chaudhary M., Choudhary M., Jat L.K. (2019) Plant growth promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) for sustainable agriculture: perspectives and challenges. [in:] PGPR amelioration in sustainable agriculture. Woodhead Publishing: 129–157.

24 

Qessaoui R., Bouharroud R., Furze J.N., El Aalaoui M., Akroud H., Amarraque A., Vaerenbergh J.V., Tahzima R., Mayad E.H., Chebli B. (2019) Applications of new Rhizobacteria pseudomonas isolates in agroecology via fundamental processes complementing plant growth. Sci. Rep. 9: 12832.

25 

Ramesh A., Sharma S.K., Sharma M.P., Yadav N., Joshi O.P. (2014) Inoculation of zinc solubilizing Bacillus aryabhattai strains for improved growth, mobilization and biofortification of zinc in soybean and wheat cultivated in Vertisols of central India. Appl. Soil Ecol. 73: 87–96.

26 

Salehi B., Sharifi-Rad R., Sharopov F., Namiesnik J., Roointan A., Kamle M., Sharifi-Rad J. (2019) Beneficial effects and potential risks of tomato consumption for human health: an overview. Nutrition 62: 201–208.

27 

Schlee S., Dietrich S., Kurćon T., Delaney P., Goodey N.M., Sterner R. (2013) Kinetic mechanism of indole-3-glycerol phosphate synthase. Biochemistry 52(1): 132–142. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi301342j

28 

Schwyn B., Neilands J.B. (1987) Universal chemical assay for the detection and determination of siderophores. Anal. Biochem. 160(1): 47–56.

29 

Shaikh S.S., Saraf M.S. (2017) Optimization of growth conditions for Zinc solubilizing plant growth associated bacteria and fungi. J. Adv. Res. Biotechnol. 2(1): 1–9.

30 

Shao J., Xu Z., Zhang N., Shen Q., Zhang R. (2015) Contribution of indole-3-acetic acid in the plant growth promotion by the rhizospheric strain Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SQR9. Biol. Fertil. Soils 51(3): 321–330.

31 

Sharma A., Patni B., Shankhdhar D., Shankhdhar S.C. (2015) Evaluation of different PGPR strains for yield enhancement and higher Zn content in different genotypes of rice (Oryza Sativa L.). J. Plant Nutr. 38(3): 456–472.

32 

Sharma S.K., Johri B.N., Ramesh A., Joshi O.P., Sai Prasad S.V. (2011) Selection of plant growth-promoting Pseudomonas spp. that enhanced productivity of soybean-wheat cropping system in central India. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 21(11): 1127–1142.

33 

Suganya A., Saravanan A., Manivannan N. (2020) Role of zinc nutrition for increasing zinc availability, uptake, yield, and quality of maize (Zea mays L.) grains: an overview. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal 51(15): 2001–2021.

34 

Upadhayay V.K., Singh A.V., Khan A., Sharma A. (2022) Contemplating the role of zinc-solubilizing bacteria in crop biofortification: an approach for sustainable bioeconomy. Front. Agron 4: 903321. https://doi.org/10.3389/fagro.2022.903321

35 

Vaid S.K., Kumar B., Sharma A., Shukla A.K., Srivastava P.C. (2014) Effect of Zn solubilizing bacteria on growth promotion and Zn nutrition of rice. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 14(4): 889–910.

36 

Vidyashree D.N., Muthuraju R., Panneerselvam P. (2018) Evaluation of zinc solubilizing bacterial (ZSB) strains on growth, yield and quality of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Int. J. Curr. Mmicrobiol. Appl. Sci. 7(4): 1493–1502. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.704.168

37 

Wang H., Liu R., You M.P., Barbetti M.J., Chen Y. (2021) Pathogen biocontrol using plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPR): role of bacterial diversity. Microorganisms 9(9): 1988.

38 

Weller D.M., Cook R.J. (1983) Suppression of take-all of wheat by seed treatments with fluorescent pseudomonads. Phytopathology 73(3): 463–469.

39 

Yadav R.C., Sharma S.K., Varma A., Rajawat M.V.S., Khan M.S., Sharma P.K., Malviya D., Singh U.B., Rai J.P., Saxena A.K., (2022) Modulation in biofertilization and biofortification of wheat crop by inoculation of zinc-solubilizing rhizobacteria. Front. Plant Sci. 13: 777771.

40 

Zaheer A., Mirza B.S., Mclean J.E., Yasmin S., Shah T.M., Malik K.A., Mirza M.S. (2016) Association of plant growth-promoting Serratia spp. with the root nodules of chickpea. Res. Microbiol. 167(6): 510–520.

Copyright: © 2023 Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/legalcode),.allowing third parties to download and share its works but not commercially purposes or to create derivative works.
 
Stosujemy się do standardu HONcode dla wiarygodnej informacji zdrowotnej This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information: verify here