Bieżący numer
Archiwum
Filmy
Artykuły w druku
O czasopiśmie
Suplementy
Rada naukowa
Recenzenci
Bazy indeksacyjne
Prenumerata
Kontakt
Zasady publikacji prac
Opłaty publikacyjne
Standardy etyczne i procedury
Panel Redakcyjny
Zgłaszanie i recenzowanie prac online
|
3/2020
vol. 122 streszczenie artykułu:
Artykuł oryginalny
Inter-eye asymmetry in manifest refraction, keratometry and pachymetry in eyes with keratoconus
Magdalena Maleszka-Kurpiel
1, 2
,
Andrzej Michalski
3
,
Marta Robak
1
,
Wojciech Warchoł
2
KLINIKA OCZNA 2020, 122, 3: 112–116
Data publikacji online: 2020/08/06
Pełna treść artykułu
Pobierz cytowanie
ENW EndNote
BIB JabRef, Mendeley
RIS Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
Aim of the study To evaluate selected visual system parameters in keratoconus patients and establish criteria which will enable better screening for keratoconus. Material and methods 146 eyes of 73 patients diagnosed with keratoconus were included in the study. Each patient underwent optometric and ophthalmological examination with corneal tomography. Results We found a statistically significant inter-eye difference between the better and worse eye in median values of uncorrected (0.24 vs. 0.62 LogMAR) and best corrected (0.03 vs. 0.24 LogMAR) distance visual acuity. Our study also showed statistically significant differences in median values of keratometry between the better and worse eye (K1 43.1 vs. 45.4 D, K2 45.2 vs. 49.0 D), mean values of thinnest central cornea (TCC) (488 vs. 458 µm) and median grade 1.5 and 2.5 for the better and worse eye, respectively. The most prevalent refractive error was compound myopic astigmatism, followed by hyperopic compound or mixed astigmatism. Conclusions Keratoconus should be suspected in patients with inter-eye differences in manifest refraction, especially when astigmatism exists. Any inter-eye asymmetry in keratometry or pachymetry values should be an indication for full keratoconus screening. |
|