eISSN: 1644-4124
ISSN: 1426-3912
Central European Journal of Immunology
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Special Issues Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
3/2017
vol. 42
 
Share:
Share:
Experimental immunology

The effect of Aeromonas hydrophila infection on the non-specific immunity of blunt snout bream (Megalobrama amblycephala)

Hu Xia
,
Ying Tang
,
Fenghui Lu
,
Yushuang Luo
,
Pinhong Yang
,
Wenbin Wang
,
Jigang Jiang
,
Na Li
,
Qing Han
,
Fei Liu
,
Lianggvo Liu

(Centr Eur J Immunol 2017; 42 (3): 239-243)
Online publish date: 2017/10/30
Article file
Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
 

Introduction

Aeromonas hydrophila is a pathogenic organism that causes a broad spectrum of diseases in humans and animals [1]. While it was thought to be an opportunistic pathogen in humans, a growing number of intestinal and extra-intestinal cases of disease indicate that Aeromonas hydrophila is an emergent human pathogen, irrespective of the immunological aspects of the host [2]. Aeromonas hydrophila is a Gram-negative motile bacillus that causes motile aeromonad septicaemia [3].
Infectious diseases are a major cause of economic loss in commercial aquaculture [4]. Like higher vertebrates, fish rely on both specific and nonspecific mechanisms to protect themselves against invading pathogens. In fish, the primary lines of non-specific defences are the skin and mucus [5]. As a first line of defence, various peptides/proteins such as lysozymes, antibodies, complement factors, and other lytic factors are present in serum, where they prevent colonisation of microorganisms, leading to prevention of infection and disease [6-8]. When pathogens enter the body, cellular and humoral non-specific defences are mobilised [5]. It is well known that the innate immune system in fish can be triggered by many immunostimulants, both synthetic and natural ingredients [5].
Blunt snout bream (Megalobrama amblycephala) is an economically important freshwater fish species in the aquaculture industry in China. However, diseases of the cultured fish have occurred frequently, and losses due to infectious diseases severely restrict the development of aquaculture. Aeromonas hydrophila infection was a major problem in the blunt snout bream culture industry in China. Until now, the effect of Aeromonas hydrophila infection on the immunity of blunt snout bream has been rarely studied, although it is very important for aquaculture [9-11]. Knowledge of the effect of Aeromonas hydrophila infection on non-specific immunity is of potential importance for the immunological control of disease in the M. amblycephala farms. Therefore, the aim of present study is to determine the effect of Aeromonas hydrophila infection on the non-specific immunity of blunt snout bream. The blood serum lysozyme activity, superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity, catalase activity, alkaline phosphatase activity, and acid phosphatase activity were examined.

Material and methods

Experimental fish

Blunt snout bream (M. amblycephala) (body weight: 45-55 g) were collected from the breeding base of the Hunan University of Arts and Science. Before the experiments, fish were acclimatised in quarantine plastic tanks in aerated freshwater at 24 ±2°C for two weeks. The experiment was approved by the guidelines of Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees (IACUC) of Hunan University of Arts and Science, Changde, China.

Challenge experiment

The bacteria Aeromonas hydrophila was isolated from diseased M. amblycephala in Dongxi Lake (Wuhan, China) by our laboratory and used for challenge experiment with intraperitoneal injection. A single colony was cultured in LB medium at 28°C to mid-logarithmic growth. In a pre-challenge experiment prior to the challenge trial, the concentration 1 × 107 colony forming units/mL (CFU/ml) was determined as LD50. A total of 240 individuals were injected with 0.1 ml (1 × 107 colony forming units [CFU]/ml) bacterial suspension per individual in the treatment group (infected group), while 240 individuals were injected with the same volume of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.2) as the control group (non-infected group). After the treatment, the fish were returned to tanks with a water temperature of 27 ± 0.5°C. Fish were euthanised by exposure to 300 mg/l of MS-222 (Sigma, USA) before sampling. Thirty injected individuals from three pools of the infected group and 30 injected individuals from three pools of the non-infected group were randomly sampled at 4 hours and 1, 3, 5, 14, 21, and 28 days post injection. Each pool sampled 10 individuals, and the samples of 10 individuals were pooled respectively.

Blood sampling

Whole blood (1 ml per individual) was collected from the caudal vein using syringes and needles that were rinsed with heparin. The blood sample was centrifuged at 1000 γ for 5 min in order to separate the blood serum. Then the sample of blood serum was stored at –20°C for CAT, AKP, ACP, T-SOD, and lysozyme activity test.

Lysozyme activity

The lysozyme activity was measured using the turbidity assay. Lysozyme standard product powder (80,000 U mg1) was used as a standard, and 1 mg lyophilised micrococcus lysodeikticus in sodium phosphate buffer (pH 5.75) was used as substrate. 20 µl plasma sample was added to 2 ml of substrate, and the reduction in the transmittance at 530 nm was determined after 20 s and 8 min of incubation. One unit of lysozyme activity was defined as an increase in transmittance of 0.001 per min.

Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity

Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity was measured by its ability to inhibit superoxide radical-dependent reactions using the Ransod Kit (Randox, Crumlin, UK). Briefly, the reaction mixture (1.7 ml) contained xanthine (0.05 mM) and 2-(4-iodophenyl)-3-(4-nitrophenol)-5-phenyltetrazolium chloride (INT, 0.025 mM) dissolved in CAPS 50 mM (pH 10.2) and EDTA (0.94 mM). In the presence of xanthine oxidase (80 U l1, 250 µl), superoxide and uric acid were produced from xanthine. Then, the superoxide radical reacted with INT to produce a red formazan dye. The optical density was measured at 505 nm, and the rate of reaction was estimated from the absorbance readings 30 s and 3 min after adding xanthine oxidase. A reference standard SOD was supplied with the Ransod Kit. One unit of SOD was defined as the amount required to inhibit the rate of xanthine reduction by 50%. Specific activity was expressed as SOD units ml–1.

Catalase, alkaline phosphatase, and acid phosphatase activity

In the experiments, we measured catalase activity (CAT), alkaline phosphatase activity (AKP), and acid phosphatase activity (ACP) of blood serum. Catalase activity, alkaline phosphatase activity, and acid phosphatase activity were determined using Diagnostic Reagent Kits purchased from Nanjing Jian Cheng Bioengineering Institute (China).

Statistical analysis

Data are presented as mean value ± standard error (SE); mean values of treatments were compared using the one-way analysis of variance by Duncan’s test using the STATISTICA software package (Version 6.0, Statsoft Inc.). Differences between the control and the treatment groups were considered to be statistically significant at p < 0.05.

Results

Lysozyme activity

Lysozyme activity in the treatment group showed significant increase (p < 0. 01) at 4 h, 1 d, 3 d, 5 d, 14 d, and 21 d compared to the control group (Fig. 1). In the treatment group, lysozyme activity was increased gradually after Aeromonas hydrophila challenge and reached the peak at 1 d, and finally there was a tendency to recover to control group level after 1 d (Fig. 1).

Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity

Superoxide dismutase activity in the treatment group showed a significant decrease at 1 d, 3 d, 5 d, 14 d, 21 d, and 28 d compared to the control group (Fig. 2). In the treatment group, superoxide dismutase activity was decreased gradually after Aeromonas hydrophila challenge (Fig. 2).

Catalase activity

A similar tendency to that observed for SOD was found for CAT. The activity of CAT was found to be significantly reduced (p < 0. 05) at 1 d, 3 d, 5 d, 14 d, 21 d, and 28 d after Aeromonas hydrophila challenge (Fig. 3). In the treatment group, catalase activity was decreased gradually after Aeromonas hydrophila challenge (Fig. 3).

Acid phosphatase activity

Acid phosphatase activity of the treatment group increased significantly (p < 0. 01) at 1 d, 3 d, and 5 d compared to the control group (Fig. 4). There was no significant difference between the treatment group and the control group at 4 h, 14 d, 21 d, and 28 d (Fig. 4). In the treatment group, catalase activity was increased gradually after Aeromonas hydrophila challenge and reached the peak at 3 d, and there was a tendency to recover to control group level (Fig. 4).

Alkaline phosphatase

Alkaline phosphatase in the treatment group showed significant increase at 4 h, 1 d, 3 d, 5 d, 14 d, and 21 d compared to the control group (Fig. 5). In the treatment group, the level of alkaline phosphatase was increased gradually after Aeromonas hydrophila challenge and reached a peak at 3 d, and there was a tendency to recover to control group level (Fig. 5). Finally, there was no significant difference between the treatment group and the control group at 28 d (Fig. 5).

Discussion

The present study preliminarily explored, for the first time, the effect of Aeromonas hydrophila infection on the non-specific immunity of blunt snout bream (Megalobrama amblycephala). Neutrophils are considered to be the source of lysozyme, and the enzyme appears to be much more bactericidal than lysozyme of higher vertebrates [12]. Lysozyme activity functions as a primary defence factor of non-specific humoral immunity in preference to cellular defence mechanisms [13]. Fish serum lysozyme is believed to be of leukocyte origin [5]. Lysozyme plays an important role in innate immunity by lysis of bacterial cell wall, and thus stimulates the phagocytosis of bacteria [14]. Its ability to disrupt the cell walls of certain pathogens makes lysozyme a natural antagonist to harmful invaders like parasites, bacteria, and viruses. Lysozyme occurs prominently in fish serum and mucus [14]. Lysozyme activity may be enhanced at relatively low concentrations of pollutants, and it has been proven that lysozyme activity is induced by relatively low dosages of mercury exposure [15, 16]. The serum lysozyme activity was significantly increased in a low-dose MC group [17]. In the present study, the significant increases of serum lysozyme activity in treatment group were detected at 4 h, 1 d, 3 d, 5 d, 14 d, and 21 d after Aeromonas hydrophila challenge. Serum lysozyme is used as an indicator of innate immune response in fish [18]. An increased level has been considered to be a natural protective mechanism in fish [19].
SOD is one of the main anti-oxidant defence enzymes generated in response to oxidative stress, which converts the highly toxic superoxide anions into hydrogen peroxide [20]. Chang et al. found that SOD decreases in P. monodon against WSSV-infected [21]. The activity of SOD was significantly lowered in WSSV-infected F. indicus [22, 23]. In the present study, the activity of SOD decreased significantly (p < 0. 05) at 1 d, 3 d, 5 d, 14 d, 21 d, and 28 d after Aeromonas hydrophila challenge. The activity of superoxide dismutase responsible for the scavenging of reactive oxygen species (ROS) decreased, leading to increases of superoxide anion [24]. An increase in the superoxide anion production against pathogens is considered to be beneficial after exposing shrimp to immunostimulants [25].
CAT is one of the primary antioxidant enzymes involved in ROS removal [26]. A similar tendency as that observed for SOD was found for CAT; the activity of CAT was found to be significantly reduced at 1 d, 3 d, 5 d, 14 d, 21 d, and 28 d after Aeromonas hydrophila challenge. These results were in line with previous studies showing that the reduction in CAT activity may be caused by poor efficiency of CAT in removing low ROS levels, or the SOD activity decline made the activity of CAT decrease [27]. Superoxide anion (O2•) was reduced to H2O2 by SOD, and H2O2 was converted to water and oxygen by CAT [28]. The production of O2- has been reported as an accurate method to measure the effectiveness of potential immunostimulants [29, 30]. An increase in H2O2 and superoxide anion is considered to be beneficially protective against disease with respect to increased immunity [29].
Alkaline phosphatase played an important role in metabolic regulation, which directly involved in the transfer of phosphate group and calcium phosphorus metabolism. Alkaline phosphatase also could change the surface structure of the pathogen to strengthen the recognition and phagocytosis of pathogens [31]. Activity of alkaline phosphatase was increased in the group of fish fed with turmeric over different days [32]. The level of alkaline phosphatase in the treatment group showed a significant increase at 4 h, 1 d, 3 d, 5 d, 14 d, and 21 d compared to the control group. An increase in the alkaline phosphatase activity is considered to be beneficial for fish disease resistance [31]. Das et al. found that the acid phosphatase activity was increased post-challenge with Aeromonas hydrophila in all groups [8]. In the present study, the acid phosphatase activity of the treatment group increased significantly (p < 0.01) at 1 d, 3 d, and 5 d, which concurred with the findings of Das et al. [8]. Increased phosphatase activity indicates higher breakdown of the energy reserve, which is utilised for the growth and survival of fish [32].

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant No. 315 72619) and Hunan University of Arts and Science research grant (15BSQD11).
The authors declare no conflict of interests.

References

1. Igbinosa IH, Igumbor EU, Aghdasi F, et al. (2012): Emerging aeromonas species infections and their significance in public health. Sci World J 2012: 1-13.
2. Figueras MJ (2005): Clinical relevance of Aeromonas sM503. Rev Med Microbiol 16: 145-153.
3. Xu XY, Shen YB, Fu JJ, et al. (2012): Matrix metalloproteinase 2 of grass carp Ctenopharyngodon idella (CiMMP2) is involved in the immune response against bacterial infection. Fish Shellfish Immunol 33: 251-257.
4. Lovell RT (1996): Feed deprivation increases resistance of channel catfish to bacterial infection. Aquacult Mag 6: 65-67.
5. Kumar S, Raman RP, Pandey PK, et al. (2013): Effect of orally administered azadirachtin on non-specific immune parameters of goldfish Carassius auratus (Linn. 1758) and resistance against Aeromonas hydrophila. Fish Shellfish Immunol 34: 564-573.
6. Misra CK, Das BK, Mukherjee SC, et al. (2006): Effect of long term administration of dietary -glucan on immunity, growth and survival of Labeo rohita fingerlings. Aquaculture 255: 82-94.
7. Alexander JB, Ingram GA (1992): Noncellular non-specific defence mechanism of fish. Annu Rev Fish Dis 2: 249-279.
8. Das BK, Debnath C, Patnaik P, et al. (2009): Effect of -glucan on immunity and survival of early stage of Anabas testudineus (Bloch). Fish Shellfish Immunol 27: 678-683.
9. Hu Xia, Kang Wu, Wanjing Liu, et al. (2014): Molecular cloning and expression analysis of immunoglobulin M heavy chain gene of blunt snout bream (Megalobrama amblycephala). Fish Shellfish Immunol 40: 129-135.
10. Hu Xia, Wanjing Liu, Kang Wu, et al. (2015): Spatio-temporal expression of blunt snout bream (Megalobrama amblycephala) mIgD and its immune response to Aeromonas hydrophila. Centr Eur J Immunol 40 (2): 132-141.
11. Hu Xia, Wanjing Liu, Kang Wu, et al. (2016):. sIgZ exhibited maternal transmission in embryonic development and played a prominent role in mucosal immune response of Megalabrama amblycephala. Fish Shellfish Immunol 54: 107-117.
12. Ellis AE (2001). Innate host defense mechanisms of fish against viruses and bacteria. Dev Comp Immunol 25: 827-839.
13. Basha KA, Raman RP, Prasad KP (2013): Effect of dietary supplemented andrographolide on growth, non-specific immune parameters and resistance against Aeromonas hydrophila in Labeo rohita (Hamilton). Fish Shellfish Immunol 35: 1433-1441.
14. Ellis AE (1990). Immunity to bacteria in fish. Fish Shellfish Immunol 9: 291-308.
15. Low KW, Sin YM, (1995): Effects of mercuric chloride on chemiluminescent response of phagocytes and tissue lysozyme activity in tilapia, Oreochromis aureus. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 54: 302-308.
16. Low KW, Sin YM, (1996): In vivo and in vitro effects of mercuric chloride and sodium selenite on some non-specific immune responses of blue gourami, Trichogaster trichopterus (Pallus). Fish Shellfish Immun 6: 351-362.
17. Qiao Q, Liang H, Zhang X, (2013): Effect of cyanobacteria on immune function of crucian carp (Carassius auratus) via chronic exposure in diet. Chemosphere 90: 1167-1176.
18. Tort L, Balasch JC, Mackenzie S (2003): Fish immune system. A cross roads between innate and adaptive responses. Imunología 3: 277-286.
19. Ingram GA (1980): Substances involved in the natural resistance of fish to infection - a review. J Fish Biol 16: 23-60.
20. Fridovich I (1995): Superoxide radical and superoxide dismutases. Annu Rev Biochem 64: 97-112.
21. Chang CF, Su MS, Chen HY, et al. (2003): Dietary-1,3-glucan effectively improves immunity and survival of Penaeus monodon challenged with white spot syndrome virus. Fish Shellfish Immunol 2003; 15: 297e310.
22. Sarathi M, Nazeer Basha A, Ravi M, et al. (2008): Clearance of white spot syndrome virus (WSSV) and immunological changes in experimentally WSSV-injected Macrobrachium rosenbergii. Fish Shellfish Immunol 25: 222-230.
23. Mohankumar K, Ramasamy P (2005): White spot syndrome virus infection decreases the activity of antioxidant enzymes in Fenneropenaeus indicus. Virus Res 115: 69-75.
24. Liu CH, Chen JC (2004): Effect of ammonia on the immune response of white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei and its susceptibility to Vibrio alginolyticus. Fish Shellfish Immunol 16: 321-334.
25. Downs C, Fauth JE, Woodley CM (2001): Assessing the health of grass shrimp (Palaemonetes pugio) exposed to natural and anthropogenic stressors: a molecular biomarker system. Mar Biotechnol 3: 380-397.
26. Sun H, Lü K, Minter EJ, et al. (2012): Combined effects of ammonia and microcystin on survival, growth, antioxidant responses and lipid peroxidation of bighead carp Hypophthalmythys nobilis larvae. J Hazard Mater 30: 213-219.
27. Dinu D, Marinescu D, Munteanu MC, et al. (2010): Modulatory effects of deltamethrin on antioxidant defense mechanisms and lipid peroxidation in Carassius auratusgibelio liver and intestine, Arch. Environ. Contam Toxicol 58: 757-764.
28. Pandey S, Parvez S, Sayeed I, et al. (2003): Biomarkers of oxidative stress: a comparative study of river Yamuna fish Wallago attu (Bl. & Schn.). Sci Total Environ 309: 105-115.
29. Song YL, Hsieh YT (1994): Immunostimulation of tiger shrimp Penaeus monodon haemocytes for generation of microbicidal substances: analysis of reactive oxygen species. Dev Comp Immunol 18: 201-209.
30. Munoz M, Cedeno R, Rodriquez J, et al. (2000): Measurement of reactive oxygen intermediate production in haemocytes of Penaeid shrimp, Penaeus vannamei. Aquaculture 91: 89-107.
31. Hu B, LI XQ, Leng XJ, et al. (2008): Effects of dietary vitamin C on growth, meat quality and non-specific immunity indices of grass carp, Ctenopharyngodon idellus. J Fish Sci China 15: 794-800.
32. Sahu S, Das BK, Mishra BK, et al. (2008): Effect of dietary Curcuma longa on enzymatic and immunological profiles of rohu, Labeo rohita (Ham.), infected with Aeromonas hydrophila. Aquaculture Research 39: 1720-1730.
Copyright: © 2017 Polish Society of Experimental and Clinical Immunology This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Quick links
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.