eISSN: 2084-9869
ISSN: 1233-9687
Polish Journal of Pathology
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Supplements Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
2/2024
vol. 75
 
Share:
Share:
Original paper

Tumour budding in invasive breast carcinoma of no special type – relationship with clinicopathological parameters

Özben Yalçın
1
,
Gamze Kulduk
1

  1. Prof. Dr. Cemil Taşcıoğlu City Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
Pol J Pathol 2024; 75 (2): 77-82
Online publish date: 2024/04/29
Article file
- Tumour budding.pdf  [0.21 MB]
Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
 

Introduction

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common malignant tumour among women worldwide and is the second leading cause of cancer death [1, 2].
Breast cancers have 4 main intrinsic molecular subtypes: luminal A, luminal B, HER2-positive, and triple-negative. These BC all have different proliferation and metastasis abilities with metabolic, genotypes, and phenotypes [3].
Tumour budding (TB) refers to the detachment of tumour cells, individually or in small clusters, from neoplastic glands at the invasive front. Although its importance has been studied mainly in the field of colorectal cancer, there are studies suggesting it is associated with an aggressive course in other solid cancers [4].
Tumour budding is defined as clusters of less than 5 cells, which are separated and isolated from the tumour mass. Tumour budding has been described as a feature of cancer cell motility and thus as first step in the metastatic process [5].
In this study, we evaluated the relationship between TB and tumour size, histological grade, axillary lymph node metastasis, angiolymphatic invasion, lymphocytic infiltration, and immunohistochemical staining (oestrogen receptor – ER, progesterone receptor – PR, HER2) patterns.

Material and methods

Study population
We studied 200 patients diagnosed with invasive breast carcinoma of no special type resected between 2018 and 2022 at the Department of Pathology, Prof. Dr. Cemil Taşcıoğlu City Hospital. Clinical information was gathered using the institute’s database records.
Pathological examination
Haematoxylin and eosin stain slides of cases were retrieved from the pathology archive and evaluated. The diagnosis was based on morphology in haematoxylin and eosin-stained sections. We followed the recommendations of the International Tumour Budding Consensus Conference held in 2016. Tumour budding was counted by selecting a “hot spot” chosen after viewing all available slides, and counts were made on haematoxylin and eosin-stained sections over 10 high-magnification fields (Fig. 1, 2).
The cases were divided into 3 groups according to the number of tumour buds: low budding (0–4), intermediate budding (5–9), and high budding (> 10).
Statistical analysis
SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) v. 25.0 software was used for statistical analysis of the data. Categorical measurements were summarised as numbers and percentages, and continuous measurements as mean and standard deviation (median and minimum-maximum where appropriate). The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to determine whether the parameters in the study showed normal distribution. The Mann-Whitney U test was used in double group analyses, and the Kruskal-Wallis test was used in analyses of more than 2 groups. The Spearman correlation test was used to determine the relationship between continuous measurements. Statistical significance was considered as 0.05 in all tests.
Compliance with ethical standards
All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Appropriate research ethics and review board permissions were obtained from Prof. Dr. Cemil Taşcıoğlu City Hospital under protocol #283 in October 2022. For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Result

The study included 200 patients. The mean number of TB was 12.8 ±9.6, and the mean tumour size was 2.27 ±1.0 cm.
The histologic grade distribution of invasive ductal carcinomas in the study was Grade I in 10 (5.1%), Grade II in 117 (59.1%), and Grade III in 71 (35.8%) patients. Nuclear grade distribution was Grade II in 52 (26.0%) and Grade III in 148 (74.0%) patients.
The accompanying ductal carcinoma in situ grades were Grade II in 52 (26.0%) patients and Grade III in 119 (59.5%) patients; 29 (14.5%) patients did not have accompanying ductal carcinoma in situ. Lobular carcinoma in situ was found in 10 (5.0%) patients (Table I).
Hormone profiles showed that 177 (88.5%) patients were ER positive; ER staining intensities were mild in 3 (1.7%), moderate in 90 (47.5%), and strong in 84 (50.8%) patients. Progesterone receptor positivity was detected in 141 (70.5%) patients; PR staining intensities were mild in 15 (10.6%), moderate in 106 (75.2%), and strong in 20 (14.2%) patients (Table I).
Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2/HER2 (c-erbB2) positivity was seen in 13 (6.5%) patients (Table I).
The presence of lymph node metastasis was detected in 86 (43.0%) patients.
Macrometastasis was detected in 62 (31.0%) patients, and the mean macrometastatic lymph node size (cm) was 1.93 ±1.0 cm. The mean macrometastatic focus size (cm) was 1.44 ±1.1 cm. Extra-nodal extension was detected in 33 (16.5%) patients. Micrometastasis was detected in 16 (8.0%) patients, and the mean micrometastatic lymph node size (cm) was 1.32 ±0.8 cm. The mean micrometastatic focus size (mm) was 0.84 ±0.5 mm (Table I).
Stromal tumour infiltrating lymphocytes were detected in 101 (50.5%) patients; the mean lymphocyte infiltration response (%) was 10.7 ±20.7 (Table I).
The presence of perineural invasion was observed in 61 (30.5%) patients. Oestrogen receptor-negative, PR-negative, and c-erbB2-negative staining was seen in 20 (10.0%) patients, and triple-negative patients had significantly lower TB counts (p = 0.001). Oestrogen receptor and PR negativity and cc-erbB2-positivity were present in 3 (1.5%) patients with no significant association with TB. Oestrogen receptor-positive, PR-positive, and c-erbB2-negative status was found in 134 (67%) patients. No significant association with TB was found. The number of TB was higher in ER-positive tumours (p = 0.015).
Twenty-seven (13.5%) patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The tumour treatment response was Grade 1 in 4 (14.8%), Grade 2 in 5 (18.5%), Grade 3 in 14 (51.9%), and Grade 4 in 4 (14.8%) according to Miller-Payne grade, respectively (Table I). The number of TB was significantly lower in patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy treatment (NACT) (p = 0.002).
Peritumoural angiolymphatic invasion was detected in 57 (28.5%) patients (Table I). Patients with peritumoural angiolymphatic invasion had significantly higher TB counts (p = 0.004).
Perineural invasion was observed in 61 (30.5%) patients (Table I).
There was a weak positive correlation between TB count and tumour size (r = 0.177) and a weak negative correlation with ER staining rate (%) (r = –0.150) (p = 0.012; p = 0.048, respectively).
No significant difference was observed between histological grade, nuclear grade, presence of ductal carcinoma in situ, stromal tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes, perineural invasion, lymph node metastasis, and number of TB (p > 0.05).
There was a weak positive correlation between the number of TB and tumour size (r = 0.177) and a weak negative correlation with ER staining intensity (%) (r = –0.150) (p = 0.012; p = 0.048, respectively).
When the cases were divided into 3 groups as low, medium, and high according to tumour bud numbers, a statistically significant correlation was observed between tumour bud and ER expression (p = 0.021), peritumoural angiolymphatic invasion (p = 0.001), and perineural invasion (p = 0.006) (Table II).

Discussion

Tumour budding has been pathophysiologically defined as an indicator of cancer cell motility and the first step of metastasis [5]. In addition, TB has recently been increasingly recognised as an aggressive behaviour and adverse prognostic factor in many cancers [6–9].
It has been emphasised that the degree of TB is an important independent prognostic factor in BC, such as tumour size, lymph node status, and lymphovascular invasion [10]. In the study by Salhia et al., a relationship was found between high TB and regional lymph node metastasis [11]. Also, Kumarguru et al. showed a significant relationship between high TB and lymphovascular invasion, lymph node metastasis, primary tumour staging, regional lymph node staging, and necrosis [12]. However, no significant association was found between TB and lymph node metastasis in our study. The difference between our study and the studies of Salhia et al. and Kumarguru et al. may be due to the rate of metastatic lymph nodes. In our patient group it was 43%, while the rates of metastatic lymph nodes in their studies were 54% and 46%, respectively [11, 12].
In our study, the number of TB was higher in patients with angiolymphatic invasion (p = 0.004). This may be explained by the fact that some BC metastasise to systemic sites before entering the lymph nodes, and tumours may cause direct invasion of blood vessels [13]. At metastatic sites, the reverse process occurs when cells regain their epithelial properties and reconnect with neighbouring cells with the help of cues in their new microenvironment [14]. In fact, cancer-associated epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)/mesenchymal to epithelial transition (MET) is believed to confer stem cell properties to cells, thus promoting the interaction between epithelial and mesenchymal states during their metastatic journey; this interaction may help them to change along the spectrum [15]. Cells less than 5 cells, tumour buds, preserve their cell connections, and there may be a partial EMT state in which the bud cells remain connected and move together through the circulation to the metastatic site. However, buds may sometimes represent the first step of detachment. Individual cells may then further detach from other bud cells and move separately. Both cases have been observed experimentally [16, 17]. In addition, studies have shown that oestrogen is involved in EMT in BC cell lines with stem cell properties, and oestrogen also plays a role in breaking the tight junction and increasing cell motility. Sun et al. and Jiménez-Salazar et al. demonstrated that oestrogen is involved in EMT in BC cell lines with stem cell properties, and it was shown that oestrogen is involved in disruption of tight-junction and increased cell motility [18, 19]. The number of TB was higher in ER-positive patients, and this may explain the statistically significant difference between TB and LVI (p = 0.015). In our study, patients with triple-negative BC had lower TB counts (p = 0.001). Also, Rathod et al. showed that the majority of cases with ER positivity were associated with high tumour budding, and it was statistically significant (p = 0.04) [20].
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has become the standard treatment for locally advanced BC. The main advantage of preoperative chemotherapy is to shrink the tumour and thus facilitate respectability and negative surgical margins. Response to the chemotherapy also gives information about the prognosis of the tumour, which helps doctors to adjust the patient’s treatment according to this chemotherapy response [21, 22]. In their study, Mozarowski et al. showed TB was frequent in BC patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy, but in our study, we found that TB counts of patients who received NACT were low (p = 0.002) [23].

Conclusions

Our results showed that tumour budding is an important prognostic factor. A standardised evaluation method should be determined, and more studies are needed with larger cohort sizes. Clarification of the mechanism of TB at the molecular level will also be useful in terms of development of alternative treatment options.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018; 68: 394-424.
2. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin 2020; 70: 7-30.
3. Kim SK, Jung WH, Koo JS. Differential expression of enzymes associated with serine/glycine metabolism in different breast cancer subtypes. PLoS One 2014; 9: e101004.
4. Lugli A, Zlobec I, Berger MD, Kirsch R, Nagtegaal ID. Tumour budding in solid cancers. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2021; 18: 101-115.
5. Okuyama K, Suzuki K, Yanamoto S. Relationship between tumor budding and partial epithelial-mesenchymal transition in head and neck cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15: 1111.
6. Kamall GH, Ulusoy C, Nikolovski A, Kamall S. Tumour budding – an additional prognostic factor in colorectal cancer survival. Pol J Pathol 2023; 74: 36-41.
7. Koyuncuoglu M, Okyay E, Saatli B, Olgan S, Akin M, Saygili U. Tumor budding and e-cadherin expression in endometrial carcinoma: are they prognostic factors in endometrial cancer? Gynecol Oncol 2012; 125: 208-213.
8. Luo L, Liu H. High-grade tumor budding is a risk factor for survival in patients with laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2023; 89: 101310.
9. Taira T, Ishii G, Nagai K, et al. Characterization of the immunophenotype of the tumor budding and its prognostic implications in squamous cell carcinoma of the lung. Lung Cancer 2012; 76: 423-430.
10. Liang F, Cao W, Wang Y, Li L, Zhang G, Wang Z. The prognostic value of tumor budding in invasive breast cancer. Pathol Res Pract 2013; 209: 269-275.
11. Salhia B, Trippel M, Pfaltz K, et al. High tumor budding stratifies breast cancer with metastatic properties. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2015; 150: 363-371.
12. Kumarguru BN, Ramaswamy AS, Shaik S, Karri A, Srinivas VS, Prashant BM. Tumor budding in invasive breast cancer – an indispensable budding touchstone. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2020; 63: S117-S122.
13. Nathanson SD, Detmar M, Padera TP, et al. Mechanisms of breast cancer metastasis. Clin Exp Metastasis 2022; 39: 117-137.
14. Voutsadakis IA. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and regulation of EMT factors by steroid nuclear receptors in breast cancer: a review and in silico ınvestigation. J Clin Med 2016; 5: 11.
15. Morel AP, Lièvre M, Thomas C, Hinkal G, Ansieau S, Puisieux A. Generation of breast cancer stem cells through epithelial- mesenchymal transition. PLoS One 2008; 3: e2888.
16. Mu Z, Wang C, Ye Z, et al. Prospective assessment of the prognostic value of circulating tumor cells and their clusters in patients with advanced-stage breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2015; 154: 563-571.
17. Wang C, Mu Z, Chervoneva I, et al. Longitudinally collected CTCs and CTC-clusters and clinical outcomes of metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2017; 161: 83-94.
18. Sun Y, Wang Y, Fan C, et al. Estrogen promotes stemness and invasiveness of ER positive breast cancer cells through Gli1 activation. Mol Cancer 2014; 13: 137.
19. Jiménez-Salazar JE, Posadas-Rodríguez P, Lazzarini-Lechu- ga RC, et al. Membrane-initiated estradiol signaling of epithelial- mesenchymal transition-associated mechanisms through regulation of tight junctions in human breast cancer cells. Horm Cancer 2014; 5: 161-173.
20. Rathod GB, Desai KN, Shrivastava A, Maru AM. Correlation of tumor budding with known clinicopathological, histomorphological and hormonal receptor status in patients with ınvasive breast carcinoma. Cureus 2022; 14: e29637.
21. Lee MC, Newman LA. Management of patients with locally advanced breast cancer. Surg Clin North Am 2007; 87: 379-398, ix.
22. Buchholz TA, Hunt KK, Whitman GJ, Sahin AA, Hortobagyi GN. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast carcinoma: multidisciplinary considerations of benefits and risks. Cancer 2003; 98: 1150-1160.
23. Mozarowski P, Rasaiah B, Reed M, Lewis A, Walde N, Voutsadakis IA. Prognostic role of tumor budding in breast cancer patients receiving neo-adjuvant therapy. J Clin Med 2021; 10: 827.
Copyright: © 2024 Polish Association of Pathologists and the Polish Branch of the International Academy of Pathology This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Quick links
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.